Summary
Science communication is vital for creating a vibrant, informed electorate. However, in this chapter we saw some of the challenges that scientists face in communicating effectively with the public in an environment of misinformation and political biases. This book was an attempt to address some of the issues involved in critical thinking in science. While it is far from exhaustive, I hope you have found it thought-provoking and that it started you on a journey of exploration into some fascinating topics about science.
| Τὸ λοιπόν, ἀδελφοί, ὅσα ἐστὶν ἀληθῆ, ὅσα σεμνά, ὅσα δίκαια, ὅσα ἁγνά, ὅσα προσφιλῆ, ὅσα εὔφημα, εἴ τις ἀρετὴ καὶ εἴ τις ἔπαινος, ταῦτα λογίζεσθε· | Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things. |
| St. Paul – Philippians 4:8 |
Key Takeaways
- Scientists have a duty to keep the public informed about recent developments and findings.
- The forms of science communication can include science journalism, health communication, podcast appearances, and public workshops and exhibitions.
- The invention of movable type printing in Europe led to greater availability of science publication to the general public.
- Four attributes of scientific literacy include knowledge of basic scientific facts, understanding of the scientific method, appreciation for the positive outcomes of science and technology, and rejection of superstitious beliefs.
- Alternative knowledge systems to modern science often uses historical injustices as an excuse to associate science with oppression.
- Science is often (incorrectly) seen as a Western knowledge system which excluded colonised populations as well as women and other minority groups when, in fact, it is a universal endeavour that anyone can pursue.
- Science communication is vital for creating a vibrant, informed society.
